Showing posts with label capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label capitalism. Show all posts

Monday, April 8, 2013


Socialism/Capitalism:  Either/Or?

We know that socialism doesn’t work.  Witness the old U.S.S.R.

But we also should know that capitalism doesn’t work either.  Witness the mess the capitalist-driven world is in right now.  

So why not try something new?  

Why don’t both sides admit they don’t have all the answers,  accept that the other side might have some good ideas, and build a new form of government based on both?

It can happen.  It’s very possible for opposite ideals to work together and create something new.  America itself is an example.  

Take justice and mercy.  They are opposites that cannot exist side-by-side, and cannot be bridged.  If we based our courts system on justice alone we would have eye-for-eye and tooth-for-tooth justice.  But if we based our courts on mercy alone we’d live in pandemonium. Yet we base our court system on both, and it works.  

Or take freedom and order.  Freedom lets you do anything you want to,  and order makes you a prisoner.   They cannot exist together.  But in our society, they do.

How?  

As E.F.Schumacher wrote in his classic book, A Guide for the Perplexed, instead of bridging differences, we transcend them.  We admit our weaknesses, appreciate each other’s strengths, work together, and give birth to something new.   It’s called transcending problems that cannot be bridged.  It’s called love.

Actually, we’ve been moving in that direction for a long time although neither side likes to admit it.  Capitalists love their police forces, their  fire departments, their libraries -- all of them socialist organizations. And in recent years communist China has discovered the beauties of capitalism. 

My dream is that capitalists and socialists will someday admit they are moving toward each other, hang up their pride, and move faster.

-Skip

Monday, March 11, 2013


Sequestration Gets Personal 


It’s a given that capitalism could not exist without unemployed people.  Where else could businesses get employees?  Thus, sad but true, capitalism rests squarely on the shoulders of unemployed people.

That may be a necessary evil of capitalism on the big stage, but inside the homes of many poor young mothers and their babies nowadays, sequestration is making it personal.  Here’s why:

One of the first non-military groups to feel the sequestration cuts has been young mothers who live in poverty.  Until sequestration started, they were getting help from the government under a program that provided formula for their babies.

But tea partiers insist that the richest among us must be protected from paying more taxes, regardless of consequences.  And since the Tea Party has become the tail that wags the dog in the Republican-controlled House, we have sequestration.  

And so, in a very real sense, the very poorest among us are forced to give up food for their babies so that the very richest among us won’t have to pay more taxes.  

All this comes at a time when, ever since we went over the cliff in 2008, the richest have been getting richer while the poor and the middle class have been getting poorer -- or, at best, stagnating.  

I don’t understand how tea partiers can live with themselves.

-Skip